IT’S ILLEGAL TO BAN SOCIAL NET ACCESS DURING ‘WORK HOURS’
European Court of Human Rights ruling surprises business
- Dateline
- 29 February 2011
A pressure group on the Facebook social networking site has created legal history by changing workplace rights for everyone in the EU.
In a bold reaction to many bosses charging that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other social networking sites were wasting employees’ time and diverting attention from their paid roles, the pressure group PeopleForce charged that the term ‘work hours’ was no longer a concept valid in today’s pressurized work environment.
“We are constantly asked to be flexible in terms of when we do our work and most of us take work home at night. We charge that it is a responsibility of employers to recognize this reality and stop putting one-sided rules in place to stop us living full lives while at the workplace,” says Julie Turner of PeopleForce. “In any event social networking sites have become an integral part of the way we connect to customers and business partners – many bosses fail to recognize that.”
While many organizations did embrace social networks to broaden communications with clients and partners in the past few years, such as HSBC (with Facebook), Deloitte (with YouTube) and the British Government (with Twitter and Facebook), many did not.
In fact PeopleForce was spawned by a 2009 interview with the chairman of Rymans, and Dragon’s Den TV star, Theo Paphitis. In it he said: “Facebook is an orgy of exhibitionism, and it’s now infected the workplace; a severe distraction. At Ryman we had to knock this problem on the head when it became obvious that staff time was being eaten up by this nonsense.”
Now those views have suddenly become outlawed. A new level of trust has to be given to employees to deliver business results using the ‘best tools available’ and they have a right to a degree of social flexibility – in terms of a split between time spent on work and personal items – a recognition that often these are best completely intertwined.
ANALYSIS >> SYNTHESIS: How this scenario came to be
The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is an international judicial body established under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) of 1950 to monitor respect of human rights by states. The European Convention on Human Rights, or formally named Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, is a convention adopted by the Council of Europe. All 47 member states of the Council of Europe are parties to the Convention. Applications against Contracting Parties for human rights violations can be brought before the Court by other states, other parties or individuals.
(Source: Wikipedia)
Links to related stories
- Theo Paphitis interview: Why ALL bosses should copy me and ban Facebook from the workplace - Daily Mail, 2 September 2009
- Why Companies Should Embrace Social Media Now - Short, Pump and Preppy blog, 31 August 2009
- British government tells civil servants to Twitter: Be 'human and credible' and write in 'informal spoken English' - MSNBC, 28 July 2009
- How executives should be using social media - BusinessWeek Special Report, 8 May 2009
- Should Your Company Have a Social Media Policy? (an HR view) - Mashable Social Media Guide, 27 April 2009
- Should companies embrace Social Media during economic turmoil? - Awareness Networks, 27 October 2008 (Obvious self-interest here, but good solid reasons nonetheless)
- Almost 60% of Americans Think Companies Should Use Social Media New Study Reveals - L'Atelier, 2008
Warning: Hazardous thinking at work
Despite appearances to the contrary, Futureworld cannot and does not predict the future. Our Mindbullets scenarios are fictitious and designed purely to explore possible futures, challenge and stimulate strategic thinking. Use these at your own risk. Any reference to actual people, entities or events is entirely allegorical. Copyright Futureworld International Limited. Reproduction or distribution permitted only with recognition of Copyright and the inclusion of this disclaimer.