Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on reddit

Flygskam kills the travel bug

As 'flight shame' takes off, Sweden's travel market bites the dust
Dateline: 15 July 2024

In a world where international air travel has almost doubled in the last five years, and is rising exponentially, one would expect an affluent market like Sweden to be absolutely booming; Swedes are outgoing, and love to travel.

The absolute opposite is the case. Fueled by the impassioned monologues of climate activism enfant prodigé Greta Thunberg, eco-conscious Scandinavians are too ashamed to fly, even for business.

What’s more, if they’re high profile celebrities, like actors and politicians, they risk being outed on Instagram and Twitter before they’ve even boarded the plane, should they succumb to the temptation to choose a fast, efficient means of transport to a foreign city. “Take the train!” scream the shaming tweets, while the poor singers and execs try to hide behind their recycled newsprint or designer shades.

It’s common knowledge that jet airliners emit more carbon dioxide per passenger kilometre than other forms of transport – most of the time. But what’s often ignored are the productivity gains from getting to your sales meeting or music gig on time, and without wasting too much time en route. And the knock-on effects.

In fact, it’s not just the travel industry that’s suffering; ‘flygskam’ is contributing significantly to the general malaise affecting the economies of Northern Europe, compounded by the high cost of ‘Energiewende’, particularly in Scandinavia, where solar is not strong. There are just too many grey and dark days.

More rational optimists are condemning these ‘futile’ attempts to go green by shunning modern technology. “You can’t go back to crofters’ cottages and horses and carts, and have global progress too,” says an irritated airline executive. “Besides, the Asian market is going crazy!”

Indeed it is. Chinese and Indian millennials are everywhere this summer. And business class is booked solid. It’s really ‘hygge’.

Links to related stories

Warning: Hazardous Thinking at Work

Despite appearances to the contrary, Futureworld cannot and does not predict the future. Our Mindbullets scenarios are fictitious and designed purely to explore possible futures, challenge and stimulate strategic thinking. Use these at your own risk. Any reference to actual people, entities or events is entirely allegorical. Copyright Futureworld International Limited. Reproduction or distribution permitted only with recognition of Copyright and the inclusion of this disclaimer. © Public domain image.

Like this article?

Share on facebook
Share on Facebook
Share on twitter
Share on Twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Share on Pinterest

Read another Mindbullet

Could the Gulf disaster have been prevented by thinking differently?
Dateline: 12 July 2011
An article in this month’s Harvard Business Review, primarily focusing on BP’s arch-competitor Shell, contains lightly-veiled criticism of BP’s thinking in the years before the Gulf blowout. The article, written by two US academics, covers Shell’s use of scenario planning from the 1970s to the present day. During the oil crises 40 years ago, executive...

Sign up to receive news from the future